Bhutan has reportedly started a blockchain migration that would move key services from Polygon to Ethereum, affecting roughly 800,000 citizens, according to a published report. The decision draws attention because it converts a national program into activity that will be publicly visible on a different public network, and it creates an array of technical and operational tasks for government teams and service providers.
Become a Doc: Profile Ethereum wallets and discover their behavior.
Use WalletAutopsy.
What the migration likely involves
The transition from one EVM-compatible chain to another typically requires more than a simple flip of a switch. It often involves auditing and porting smart contracts, migrating records or tokenized credentials, and setting up bridging or native issuance mechanisms. Those steps will create identifiable on-chain events: contract deployments, token transfers, and bridge transactions. Careful planning will be needed to ensure continuity of service and to prevent data loss during the migration.
Technical and cost implications
Moving core services to Ethereum raises immediate questions about transaction fees and throughput. Ethereum mainnet delivers strong decentralization and security properties, but its base fees can be higher than many L2s and sidechains. The country or its vendors will need to decide whether to absorb fees, subsidize user activity, or use rollup architectures and batching to limit per-transaction costs. These choices will determine both the user experience and the budgetary footprint of the program.
Wallets and user experience
Onboarding hundreds of thousands of people to blockchain-based services hinges on the design of crypto wallets and custody models. Governments and integrators must weigh custodial options that simplify access against non-custodial wallets that preserve user control. Smart contract wallets with social recovery or delegated guardianship could reduce lost-key incidents, but they introduce their own operational complexity. User interfaces, language support, and mobile-first design will influence adoption as much as the underlying chain choice.
On-chain visibility and monitoring
Activity on Ethereum will be publicly visible and amenable to analysis by third parties. That visibility means observers can track contract deployments, large token flows, and bridge usage in near real time. Institutions monitoring the migration will rely on crypto analytics tools to map addresses, spot anomalous transfers, and measure network fees tied to the rollout. Public on-chain records help with transparency but also expose metadata about interactions that might be sensitive for individuals.
Security and governance challenges
Security work will be central to the migration. Smart contracts moving to a new environment require fresh audits and testing under mainnet conditions. Key management policies must be explicit: who holds administrative keys, what multisig arrangements govern upgrades, and how emergency procedures will operate. The program must guard against phishing, social engineering and supply-chain attacks that often target large-scale rollouts. Changes to governance or upgrade paths will appear in on-chain calls and should be documented for public review.
Privacy, identity and legal considerations
Putting identity-related records on a public blockchain raises legal and privacy questions. Records that are only pointers or hashed representations reduce direct exposure, yet they still create linkable signals between addresses and off-chain identities. Policymakers will need to reconcile data-protection rules with the transparent nature of public ledgers, and consider permissioned alternatives or privacy-preserving layers where appropriate. Any contractual framework with vendors should clarify how personal data is handled during and after migration.
Network and market effects
A mass migration of accounts and activity to Ethereum could change short-term demand for gas and influence liquidity patterns, depending on how transactions are structured. If releases require large on-chain registrations or batch settlements, observers will see spikes in transaction volume and fee pressure in block data. The migration may also prompt partners and service providers to adjust their integrations to remain compatible with the new execution environment.
How analysts and citizens can follow the rollout
Anyone tracking the migration should look for contract addresses published by official channels, and then monitor transactions and transfers tied to those addresses. Watch for bridge contracts that move assets between Polygon and Ethereum, and for batch settlement calls that reveal enrollment patterns. Public statements from government sources offer context for on-chain events; the initial report was published by CryptoPotato, which cited the migration. Observers should verify addresses against official announcements to avoid confusion with unrelated deployments.
Risks for users and mitigations
Users will face practical risks during a migration of this size. Misconfigured bridges, expired approvals, or mistaken transfers can create loss scenarios. Outreach and education are essential. Clear guidance on wallet backup, trusted verification points for contract addresses, and staged rollouts will reduce user risk. Service providers should publish step-by-step instructions and use credentialing that minimizes repetitive on-chain actions for individual users.
What to expect in the coming weeks
Expect incremental on-chain signals as the project proceeds: initial contract deployments, followed by registration transactions and bridge movements. Each phase will produce measurable data that analytics vendors and independent researchers can track. The program's budgeting choices will surface in fee patterns and in any measures taken to batch or subsidize transactions. Observers should avoid assuming long-term policy intent from early technical decisions, and instead read the unfolding record as a sequence of operational moves.
In sum, the reported migration from Polygon to Ethereum for roughly 800,000 citizens represents a complex technical program with measurable consequences on fees, custody, and public on-chain data. It will be important to follow official communications closely, verify contract addresses before interacting, and use established monitoring techniques to understand how the rollout affects network activity and user risk.