Bitcoin slipped under $86,000 on December 1 as several developments converged, producing a sudden increase in sell-side pressure. This report examines transaction-level movements and wallet activity to explain how policy news, fund flows and a DeFi exploit combined to push prices lower.
Become a Doc: Profile Ethereum wallets and discover their behavior.
Use WalletAutopsy.
Immediate market reaction and price move
Traders reacted quickly after a Bank of Japan announcement altered expectations for global rates, and Bitcoin fell in tandem with risk assets. The move was not isolated; price pressure intensified when institutional funds registered net outflows from spot products, and a separate DeFi exploit added a fresh wave of uncertainty to markets.
Order books thinned as selling accelerated, prompting liquidations in leveraged positions and forcing some long holders to exit. Exchange inflows rose measurably on-chain, consistent with participants routing assets toward platforms that facilitate sales; those transfers coincided with a notable drop in the BTC/USD pair below the $86,000 threshold.
ETF outflows and observable on-chain flows
Fund movement created clear signals on-chain. Large transfers from custodial addresses associated with fund administrators and known institutional wallets moved into exchange-controlled addresses in the hours after the BOJ note. These transfers matched patterns historically tied to product redemptions and secondary-market liquidations.
On-chain data shows elevated exchange inflows and decreased long-term hodling during the episode. The activity aligns with what crypto analytics tools typically flag as distribution phases: clusters of large signatures moving coins that had been dormant, followed by rapid dispersal through trading venues. That sequence amplified downside momentum.
DeFi exploit and its wallet-level consequences
Security events compounded market stress. Reports attributed a separate DeFi exploit to sudden token movement and subsequent swaps into major assets, which increased liquidation risk across interconnected positions. Funds compromised in the exploit filtered through a chain of addresses before landing on exchanges, a behavior pattern that on-chain investigators note as high risk for market confidence.
Wallets linked to the exploit showed accelerated activity, with transfers routing proceeds through intermediary contracts to obscure origins before conversion. That routing produced additional sell pressure when converted assets hit centralized venues, raising the overall supply available to traders at a fragile moment.
What wallet-level data reveals
Large holder behavior proved decisive. Entities that control substantial amounts of Bitcoin began moving balances more actively than usual, and many of those transfers ended at exchange addresses. Analytics firms observed a pattern: accumulation pockets unwound into exchange inflows, suggesting coordinated or reactive selling rather than fresh buying interest.
On-chain indicators provided transparency about timing and intent. Metrics such as change in active wallet counts, spike patterns in large transfers, and age-band movement in supply all signaled distribution. Analysts using crypto analytics traced several clusters of activity back to wallets that had been largely dormant, indicating that longer-term holders contributed to near-term liquidity.
Impacts on crypto wallets and custody behavior
Custodial addresses registered higher throughput as funds moved to platforms capable of executing large trades. That shift highlighted a broader trend in which market participants prefer centralized rails when rapid liquidity is required. The preference reshaped short-term custody behavior and raised questions about routing and settlement timing for sizable orders.
Noncustodial users displayed different responses. Smaller, retail wallets tended to hold or reduce exposure more gradually, whereas larger, professional wallets showed decisive reallocation. The contrast clarified how market structure and wallet type influence the speed at which supply reaches trade venues.
Attribution and reporting
Initial coverage of the series of events was collected by industry outlets that tracked the BOJ policy development, the ETF outflows and the DeFi exploit. This article references reporting by ts2.tech for the earliest public signals, and pairs that information with on-chain transaction traces and fund movement visible across public ledgers.
Verification relied on transparent blockchain records rather than private statements. Transaction hashes, wallet addresses and exchange deposit patterns provided a factual basis for linking the sell pressure to identifiable flows. That record allowed a clear line between macro triggers and on-chain activity.
Near-term market implications
Volatility will likely remain elevated as markets process the combined effects of policy surprise, fund flows and the security event. Traders and portfolio managers now face an environment where liquidity can shift rapidly, and on-chain signals offer an early read on whether selling is concentrated or dispersed across many holders.
Risk managers should monitor exchange balances and large-wallet transfers closely. Sustained inflows to exchanges accompanied by decreased accumulation among long-term holders suggest further downward pressure until buyers re-emerge at lower price levels. That dynamic will determine whether this episode marks a brief pullback or a deeper correction.
What to watch in the hours ahead
Watch for reversal signals on-chain: declining exchange inflows, renewed accumulation by long-term wallets, and reduced outflow from custodial addresses. A clear shift in those metrics would indicate restoration of confidence and a potential stabilization above recent lows.
Conversely, additional transfers from large addresses into exchanges or fresh revelations about the exploit that widen counterparty exposure would extend selling pressure. Stakeholders tracking market health should combine order-book data with on-chain monitoring to form a complete view of supply pressure affecting the BTC/USD pair.
Conclusion
Bitcoin moved below $86,000 on December 1 because multiple forces converged in a short window: a Bank of Japan surprise that shifted risk sentiment, institutional outflows from exchange-traded products, and an exploit that routed assets through multiple wallets before conversion. The result produced measurable exchange inflows and distribution among sizable holders, visible in public transaction records.
For practitioners and analysts, the episode underlines the value of wallet-level tracking and on-chain insight. Combining those signals with traditional market metrics yields a clearer understanding of pressure points and the pace at which supply can reach the market. Continued attention to these indicators will be essential as the market absorbs these developments.
WalletAutopsy will continue to monitor exchange deposits, large transfers and contract flows as they evolve, providing updates on on-chain metrics that signal renewed accumulation or persistent distribution.